Posts by Ben Wasserman:
PA: Not Naming A Necessary Party: Not Always Necessary!
Schenkel v. Monheit, 226 Pa. Super. 396 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979) Student Contributor: Melissa Goldberg PA Underlying personal injury action. Facts: Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident when his …
- Posted on: Dec 2 2009
- View all 10 reponses
PA: Conflicts and Malpractice in Commercial Transactions
Fiorentino v. Rapoport, 693 A.2d 208 (Pa. Super. 1997). PA underlying sale of business interest : conflict of interest Student contributor: Cheryl Neuman Facts: Plaintiff and his business partner had …
- Posted on: Dec 1 2009
- View all 7 reponses
NY: Negligent Representation? No Fee.
Campagnola v. Mulholland, Minion & Roe, (pdf) 76 N.Y.2d 38 (N.Y. 1990); 555 N.E.2d 611 N.Y. Underlying personal injury action Student Contributor: Jason Klein Facts: Plaintiff was struck by a car …
- Posted on: Nov 30 2009
- View all 14 reponses
NJ: Doing Business With Your Clients: DON'T!
Profit Sharing Trust for Marprowear Corporation v. Lampf, Lipkind, Prupis, Petigrow & Labue 267 N.J. Super. 174, 630 A.2d 1191 (1993) NJ Underlying Investment Transaction Student Contributor: Natalie Resto Facts: …
- Posted on: Nov 27 2009
- View all 10 reponses
"Oldies but Goodies" for theThanksgiving Holiday
Let’s take a break for the Thanksgiving holiday with some easy to read classics from the Lawyers’ Professional Liability Committee of the American Bar Association Happy Thanksgiving! …
- Posted on: Nov 25 2009
- Leave a reponse
Bouncing Back After Malpractice
The Editorial Board of the Legal Malpractice Law Review is pleased to invite you to an online discussion starting on Monday morning November 16, 2009 led by: Professor …
- Posted on: Nov 13 2009
- Leave a reponse
NJ: Restoring "Wholeness" to Victims of Legal Malpractice
Bailey v. Pocaro & Pocaro, 305 N.J.Super. 1, 701 A.2d 916 (App. Div.1997). Student Contributor: Todd Feinstein NJ: Underlying Litigation Facts: This case found its way back to court after …
- Posted on: Nov 12 2009
- View all 17 reponses
PA: No Need for Expert Witness where the Lawyer's Malpractice is Obvious
Antonis v. Liberati 821 A.2d 666 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003) Student Contributor: Evan Kusnitz PA Underlying Mortgage Transaction Facts: Plaintiff hired Attorney to prepare a mortgage and note as a security …
- Posted on: Nov 9 2009
- View all 11 reponses
Legal Malpractice Experts to Prove a Reasonable Settlement Value in the Underlying Case
“Underlying case” “Settlement Value” Experts “Fishman v. Brooks”
- Posted on: Nov 6 2009
- View all 4 reponses
NJ Legal Malpractice Per Se: No Expert's Affidavit Required
“common knowledge” “trial de novo” “negligence per se”
- Posted on: Nov 3 2009
- View all 3 reponses