NJ Legal Malpractice Per Se: No Expert's Affidavit Required
"common knowledge" "trial de novo" "negligence per se"
"common knowledge" "trial de novo" "negligence per se"
Brizak v. Needle, 239 N.J. Super. 415, 571 A.2d 975 (1990) Student Contributor: Maninder (Meena) Saini NJ Underlying Statute of Limitations and Duty to Investigate Facts: Plaintiff-client commenced a malpractice ...
Muhammed v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod and Gutnik 526 Pa. 541, 587 A.2d 1346 (Pa. 1991) PA Underlying Medical Malpractice Litigation Student Contributor: Justin B. Lieberman Facts: Former client sued ...
Gilles v. Wiley, Malehorn & Sirota, 345 N.J. Super. 119, 783 A.2d 756 (N.J.Super.A.D., 2001) NJ Underlying case: Litigation; Medical Malpractice Student Contributor: Geri Mulligan Facts: Lawyer represents plaintiff in ...
Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keef 291 N.W.2d 686 (Min. 1980) Facts: Plaintiff had consulted with an attorney about bringing a medical malpractice claim. At the conclusion of the ...